RESEARCH, WITH CONTEXT.Original sources. Clear limitations.Our approach
SBThe Study BriefingSCIENCE MADE READABLE
Back to the reading collection

THE STUDY BRIEFING / SOURCE INDEX

Follow the briefing back to its sources.

A headline is a framing of research, not the experiment itself. This source index follows the original papers cited in the briefing and connects each one to the essay where its interpretation is discussed.

Use the reading context to identify the question being examined: sponsorship, the choice of comparator, the outcome or the way a result becomes a headline. Background reviews and official guidance remain in each article’s full bibliography; this index includes sources labeled as original papers.

4 distinct original-paper links cited across 3 guides in this edition. Each link is counted once, even when several articles cite it.

Showing 4 of 4 original-paper links.

Retatrutide2026
Randomised trial

Retatrutide, a Triple Hormone Receptor Agonist, for Treatment of Obesity (opens the original source in a new tab)

New England Journal of Medicine

Design
Phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial; 80 weeks. Weight endpoints used a treatment-regimen intention-to-treat estimand.
Population / setting
Adults with obesity without diabetes; prespecified subgroups included participants with knee osteoarthritis or obstructive sleep apnoea.
Sample size
n = 2,339

What was observed
At week 80, mean weight changes were −17.6%, −23.7% and −25.0% in the three retatrutide groups versus −3.9% with placebo. The two higher groups differed from placebo by −19.8 and −21.0 percentage points. Gastrointestinal events were the most common adverse events.

Keep in view
These weight results are intention-to-treat estimates; the paper uses a different hybrid estimand for osteoarthritis and sleep-apnoea endpoints. This is not a head-to-head comparison with other medicines or evidence of multi-year safety. Publication is not marketing authorisation. Funded by Eli Lilly.

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

Tirzepatide / semaglutide2025
Randomised trial

Tirzepatide as Compared with Semaglutide for the Treatment of Obesity (opens the original source in a new tab)

New England Journal of Medicine

Design
Phase 3b, randomised, open-label, active-controlled trial; 72 weeks at the maximum tolerated study regimens.
Population / setting
Adults with obesity without type 2 diabetes.
Sample size
n = 751

What was observed
Mean weight change at week 72 was −20.2% with tirzepatide versus −13.7% with semaglutide. Mean waist-circumference change was −18.4 cm versus −13.0 cm. Both comparisons favoured tirzepatide (P<0.001).

Keep in view
This direct comparison was open-label and tested particular regimens in a specific population. Weight superiority does not establish superiority for cardiovascular events, every clinical outcome or every individual. Gastrointestinal adverse events were common. Funded by Eli Lilly.

Open the original paper (opens in a new tab)

WHY THIS SOURCE IS HERE

THE RESEARCH NETWORK

Two destinations.
One commitment to context.

Explore PepTup Europe and Echo Peptides, the research-material brands connected to this publication. Echo’s public study hub is one of our editorial sources; original papers are linked separately.

These are commercial relationships. A paper about a molecule does not validate a supplier’s product or establish suitability for human use.

Preparing your reading access…